Retrospec Chatham Rev 2 Step Through Review, 2024
A spectacularly affordable sub-$1k cruiser with comfort and climbing ability!
With a list price of $899.99, the bike falls firmly on the affordable end of the spectrum. We are accustomed to major sacrifices in features and performance at this price point, but the Chatham Rev 2 seemed solidly put-together with an uncommonly high-quality ride feel. It’s basic, but still somehow manages to pack everything it needs into a low-cost package.
For example, it has a wonderfully comfortable ride! Fans of casual and relaxed cruisers will feel right at home on the plush, ample saddle. The ergonomic, swept-back handlebars have squishy rubber grips for slip-free steering, and the upright riding position provides a comfortable vantage point for taking in the scenery.
E-bikes of this style are known for a leisurely experience, and the Chatham Rev 2’s 350W rear-hub motor provides exactly that. From reserved to really fast, the bike features 5 levels of pedal assistance to help you confidently climb hills without getting worn out.
We tested the bike’s speed, uphill power, stopping ability, and more – keep reading our full Retrospec Chatham Rev 2 ST review below for all the details!
- Crazy affordable! With an MSRP of just $900, there aren’t many other quality e-bikes like it on the market.
- Comfortable to ride, with its upright positioning, swept-back handlebars, rubber grips, thick saddle, and cushy tires.
- Better than expected uphill power for a 350W rear-hub motor.
- Feels stable when riding, cornering and braking with a rigid frame and 26”x3” Compass fat tires.
- No need to swing a leg over the saddle; the step-thru frame makes it easy to hop on and ride.
- Functions well as an analog bike with its battery weight balanced behind the seatpost.
- Includes useful extras like a chain guard and battery powered lights.
- A retro design with simple construction keeps it simple but classic.
- While the throttle can help get you moving, we’d like to see a cadence sensor that engages faster.
- We expect tradeoffs at this price point, but our wish list for the future includes a small display (or phone mount), integrated lights, and a bell.
- Battery: 36V/10 Ah/360 Wh, removable
- Display: LED indicator panel
- Motor: 36V/350W Motor
- Headlight:Battery operated
- Taillights:Battery operated
- Pedal Assist: PAS 1-5, cadence sensor
- Range: 25+ miles
- Throttle:Thumb throttle
- UL Certification:Coming January 2024
- Claimed weight: 58.5 lbs (battery included) / 59.0 lbs actual
- Rider height range: 5’-0” to 6’-2”
- Total payload capacity: 350 lbs
- Brakes:Tektro mechanical with 180mm rotors and semi-metallic pads
- Fenders: Available separately
- Fork: Rigid Steel
- Frame: Steel
- Drivetrain: Shimano Tourney 7 speed, 42T chainring, 14-34T cassette
- Grips: Comfort with alloy lock rings
- Saddle: Comfort Cruiser
- Handlebar: Alloy cruiser
- Kickstand: Rear mount, adjustable, aluminum alloy
- Pedals: PP platform 9/16″
- Tires: 26”x3.0” Compass
Retrospec Chatham Rev 2 ST Review: Speed Test
We performed a Speed Test with the Chatham Rev 2 ST on a flat segment of our local multi-use paths to determine its maximum speed in each pedal assist system (PAS) setting. The bike uses a cadence sensor to engage and sustain its motor, and as is common with such setups, also has preset “speed limits” in each setting. The rider can pedal beyond these thresholds using leg power, but the motor only assists up to the preset point.
To determine what these thresholds were, I soft pedaled throughout the test. Starting with only my own effort (the motor was deactivated in PAS 0) I reached a speed of 10 miles per hour. With the lowest active pedal assist setting, PAS 1, the motor provided a small dose of power which brought the bike to 10.8 mph. My max speed in PAS 2 was increased to a lively 14.7 mph, followed by a carefree 17.8 mph in PAS 3. I reached 19.6 mph in PAS 4, and finally 21.6 mph in PAS 5.
The Chatham Rev 2 is advertised as a Class 2 e-bike with both its throttle and PAS limited to 20 mph, but the bike exceeded that limit in PAS 5. To be clear, we used a third party app to measure our speed since the bike does not include a display; we have noticed slight discrepancies between displays and the app when testing other e-bikes, but this is usually around 0.5 mph.
Regardless of its speed limitations, the Chatham Rev 2 ST’s results show a pattern that we hope to see with every e-bike. Its power output and maximum speeds are evenly distributed across all of its PAS settings, which gives the rider an expected increase in power when moving up through them.
We appreciated the mellowness of PAS 1; this setting felt appropriate for riders who want to move at a slower pace. E-bikes with 36V electrical systems and 350W rear-hub motors are often not the most energetic in their acceleration, but we also liked the more lively feel of PAS 2 and higher. These settings provided a steadily-building and fun dose of power for moving quickly (but not TOO fast).
All-in-all, the Chatham Rev 2 performed very well in this test, providing a measured and well-balanced distribution of speed and power appropriate for leisure rides or commuting.
Retrospec Chatham Rev 2 ST Review: Range Test
Our Range Tests (explained in the graphic above) measured the Chatham Rev 2’s battery life when using PAS 5 and PAS 1. We traveled 13.8 miles with maximum power and 31.9 miles using the minimum, with the expectation that most riders should end up between these bookend figures.
The brand advertises a range of 38+ miles, which seems reasonable on flat ground considering our results. The bike paths used in our testing have numerous elevation changes, which contribute to lower overall range, as the motor works harder and draws more power when traveling uphill. Overall, the Chatham Rev 2 has a fairly low range when compared to similar cruiser-style e-bikes we have tested, but we feel that it did relatively well in this test considering its specs and programming.
Based on the nominal output of its 350W rear-hub motor and capacity of its 36V, 360 Wh battery, we anticipated our PAS 5 test would take roughly an hour to complete, with a mileage result of about 18 miles. Our actual results were below these estimates, suggesting that its motor was less efficient than expected.
This makes sense given the lively and powerful feel of its motor. Not to get ahead of ourselves, but we found the bike’s motor to be capable of powering up and over hills even in its lowest setting. We do not currently know the peak wattage and torque output of its motor (updates to come when we do), but going by the bike’s feel, it seems to “run hot,” or have uncommonly high output (which drains its battery faster) when compared to similar 350W rear-hub motors we have tested.
In the big picture, its results were not too dissimilar from other e-bikes using 350W motors, cadence sensors, and batteries with similar capacity. Additionally, the nearly 14-32 miles it should provide is likely to cover a single commute or many shorter rides. We think this amount of range is a good compromise for the Rev 2’s price, but those seeking an e-bike with greater range may want to consider the Retrospec Chatham Rev+.
Retrospec Chatham Rev 2 ST Review: Hill Test
With just 350W of nominal output from its motor, we did not expect tremendous results from the Chatham Rev 2. This amount of power is relatively low in the grand scheme, and the 36V electrical system limits the motor’s ability to draw power (and use it) quickly from the battery. We have yet to test an e-bike with the same specs that was able to complete the throttle portion of our test.
In the pedal portion of the test, the Chatham Rev 2 performed better than average when compared to other e-bikes we have tested with 350W rear-hub motors. As mentioned previously, its motor seems to produce a higher than average amount of power more steadily than many other 350W drive systems, which gives the bike a clear advantage on inclines.
Outside of our official Hill Test, I took the bike to a secondary test location near the Electric Bike Report office to give its throttle and PAS a personal evaluation (as Justin performs all of our testing at Hell Hole). This location is not as extreme as Hell Hole, but it is still an intimidating hill that most riders would not choose to pedal up without a motor.
There, the bike was successful in its throttle test; the bike slowed to roughly 6 miles per hour but kept moving steadily until it reached the top. I performed two separate tests using the PAS; the bike climbed confidently in PAS 5, and its second trial in PAS 1 felt nearly identical. Overall, there was only a 13 second difference in time and a 1.6 mph difference in average speed between the two. It’s also worth noting that my pedaling in both tests was generally relaxed; I did not feel strained or out of breath when finished.
Our official and secondary tests show that the Chatham Rev 2’s throttle may not be powerful enough for extreme slopes, but under more average conditions, it should serve to carry the bike and its rider steadily over hills. When using the pedal assist system, riders can expect to do well in any setting, though there is clearly more contribution from the motor in higher modes.
Retrospec Chatham Rev 2 ST Review: Brake Test
With three sets of data (gathered through the process explained above), we calculated an average stopping distance of 22’-6” for the Chatham Rev 2 in our Brake Test, which is well within the range of expected results.
In truth, these results are better than we expected from a 59-lb e-bike with mechanical disc brakes. Tektro manufactures quality brakes, but mechanical systems typically have a lesser degree of modulation and overall stopping power when compared to hydraulic brakes. Furthermore, 59 lbs is generally in the mid-range of e-bike weight, and near the point where hydraulic brakes are preferred.
When comparing these results with those of other e-bikes we have tested, our pool of cruiser-style models with mechanical brakes was small, so we opened up our filters to include folding e-bikes, commuters, and city bikes. Many of these models were lighter than the Chatham Rev 2 – and thus easier to stop (hence the reason they use mechanical brakes) – but there was enough variation with this larger group for a more relevant comparison.
The average for this more substantial pool of e-bikes was 23’-4”, which shows that the mechanical system on the Chatham Rev 2 is more than adequate to provide better-than-average stopping power. It’s also cost-effective; mechanical brakes help to keep the bike’s overall cost down, and they are simple to maintain.
Ultimately, we are completely satisfied with the Chatham Rev 2’s Brake Test results. Its wider-than-average tires likely helped to aid its performance by providing added rolling resistance, but regardless, the bike did a great job.
Retrospec Chatham Rev 2 ST Review: Ride Quality
We also liked the bike’s contact points; the wide saddle was supportive and accommodating. The rubberized pedals offered good grip without the risk of shin damage, should a foot somehow slip off. And where many cruiser-style e-bikes use faux leather grips, we appreciated the squishy rubber grips that were easy to hold on to.
With its single-size frame, the Chatham Rev 2 accommodates riders from 5’-0” to 6’-2” with 7.5” of adjustment in saddle height (with the battery operated tail light on the seatpost). Its standard stem can be loosened to allow up/down rotation of the curved handlebars for hand height/wrist angle adjustment, though the functional range is limited. At 5’-11”, I could tell that I was nearing the high end of the bike’s accommodation range, but was still able to achieve a comfortable fit with proper leg extension.
The step-thru frame has a standover height of 19”, allowing riders to mount/dismount without the need to lift a leg completely over the saddle. While this is certainly not the lowest standover we have measured, it’s far from the highest, and we appreciated the added stability of the top tube which runs parallel to the down tube of the frame.
The Chatham Rev 2 uses a rigid steel frame with no suspension, though its 26”x3” Compass street tires were wide enough to generally counteract that absence. We rode with the tire pressure set to the middle of its 25-45 psi range, and enjoyed a moderate degree of shock absorption from the tires; lower tire pressure would have been more comfortable, but would also have increased the risk of getting a flat (at least in our desert environment where everything is sharp!).
We found the bike’s cockpit layout to be simple and functional. Instead of a display, a small control panel with LED indicator lights is mounted to the left handlebar. A Shimano Tourney over-the-bar shifter is included on the right, which we found to be comfortable and easy to operate.
One area we do feel needs improvement is the bike’s motor engagement. We appreciated its power once activated, but the motor took a full 3-4 seconds to turn on once the pedals started moving. This equated to at least that many full rotations of the cranks, which felt excessive considering that most cadence sensors we’ve tested (this year) have triggered their motors with ¼ turn. We found the throttle helpful in getting the bike moving, but we’d prefer a more responsive cadence sensor.
That aside, the overall feel of the drive system was good. With a 7-speed Shimano Tourney drivetrain, we anticipated some degree of ghost pedaling at the higher end of the bike’s speeds, and observed that it started in PAS 4 at around 18-19 mph. On anything but a cruiser-style bike, we would consider this a downside, but in this case we think it fits the Chatham Rev 2’s casual feel.
We enjoyed the overall retro styling of the Chatham, as well as the classic feel of its aluminum trim that came on the “Sea Mist” color. The other color option, “Overcast Gray,” includes black trim.
Before concluding this Retrospec Chatham Rev 2 review, I want to give the brand credit for two of the small extras that we appreciated. First, considering the bike’s price point, it would have been easy to opt solely for reflectors, so we like that they chose to include battery-operated lights. Additionally, we are always grateful for an included chain guard, as it removes the concern of greasy pants.
Bottom line: the Chatham Rev 2’s ride quality has a couple of small tradeoffs for its price, but is overall very solid.
Retrospec Chatham Rev 2 ST Review: Summary / Where to Buy
While we noticed a few noticeable tradeoffs the brand made to keep their costs manageable – a relatively small battery, mechanical brakes, an economy-tier drivetrain, etc. – none of these elements drastically reduced the quality of its performance. The Chatham Rev 2 could feel powerful when needed and had an ideal distribution of speeds across settings. It traveled a respectable distance for its specs, and demonstrated effective stopping power.
More than that, however, the bike proved to be fun to ride – and it’s accessible to just about anyone thanks to its wallet-friendly, entry-level price. We advocate strongly for any means of encouraging folks to spend more time on bikes, and nothing is quite so tempting as a cool, fun, and functional e-bike that doesn’t break the bank.
If you’re looking for an affordable, full-size e-bike that will get you to work/school or let you cruise casually around town, we encourage you to to take a closer look at the Chatham Rev 2. We think you’ll be hard-pressed to find a similar, super-comfortable, and solidly-performing e-bike for less!
Happy Riding! Make sure to let us know if you have any questions or if you think we left anything out in this review of the Retrospec Chatham Rev 2 ST down in our comments section.