500W vs. 750W E-Bike: Does wattage matter on hills?
Does size matter? It’s a query as old as time that, depending on who you ask and in what situation, is going to yield a broad and potentially colorful range of answers.
In the less colorful context of electric bikes, motor size (to most people) very much does seem to matter. The general consensus is that bigger is better. More watts equals more power; equals more speed; equals an easier time climbing hills. But is bigger always better, or can a carefully tuned smaller motor compete with sheer wattage?
We set out to explore this question with a simple test: A head-to-head uphill race between a powerful 750W rear hub motor e-bike and a 500W rear hub motor e-bike that the brand claimed had been specifically tuned for hill climbing.
The result of that test was about as we expected, with the more powerful bike winning our race, but the relationship between motor size and climbing ability is far more complicated than power alone.
The test: How we did it and why
In the wake of Electric Bike Report’s September, 2021 review of the Tower Beach Bum 2, the brand reached out to us noting that their bike, which uses a 500W rear hub motor, had gone just as fast or faster up our test hill than some 750W e-bikes we’ve reviewed.
Better yet, the brand’s founder, Stephan Aarstol, pointed out in an email, the Beach Bum electric cruiser bike had climbed faster than several Class 3 750W e-bikes, while the 500W Tower was limited to Class 2 speeds. In fact, he said, the Beach Bum was near the top of our hill test all-time leaderboard (at that time).
Aarstol wondered if we unlocked the Beach Bum to Class 3 speeds, if it wouldn’t be one of the quickest climbing bikes on our test hill. His bike, he explained, had a motor that is specifically tuned to climb hills quickly.
So, to test Aarstol’s claim and attempt to answer the question of if bigger is better, we devised a plan to pit the Beach Bum against a similar but higher wattage e-bike.
The location would remain the same; we’d use our test hill, Hell Hole, a one-third of a mile long section of bike path with an average gradient of 12 percent. To keep the playing field relatively level, we chose the Blix Sol Eclipse electric cruiser bike as the more powerful challenger. That bike is similarly priced, similarly spec’d and of similar style to the Tower, but uses a more powerful 750W rear hub motor. It’s also an electric cruiser that put down an exceptional time on our test hill when we reviewed it last year.
Like in our standard review process, we’d conduct two timed laps up Hell Hole on each bike. One lap using just the throttle and the other using PAS 5.
The results: Blix beats Tower, higher watts prevail
Alas, for those rooting for the underdog, Goliath has prevailed and, at least in this limited test, added evidence to the argument that size does indeed matter (at least when it comes to e-bike motors).
In the PAS 5 test, the 750W Blix Sol Eclipse bested the 500W Tower Beach Bum 2 by a margin of 10 seconds with a time of 1:01.00 compared to the Tower’s 1:11.00. Ten seconds may not seem like a large difference, but in a distance of one-third of a mile just a few seconds can equate to a sizable difference in speed. The Blix, for example, held an average speed during the PAS 5 test of 17.8 mph while the Tower had an average speed of 15.3 mph.
Despite upping the Beach Bum 2 to Class 3 speeds, it doesn’t appear to compete with the more powerful 750W e-bikes.
We saw similar results in the throttle only test, with the Blix beating the Tower with a time of 1:19.00 to 1:35.00, but this is about what we expected as the Beach Bum’s change in speed setting only affects pedal assist and not throttle performance.
At least in this test, the more powerful 750W Blix was the best performer despite the Tower’s carefully tuned motor and higher pedal assist speed. You go, little rockstar.
Some context: Why power isn’t always everything
In this instance power has reigned king, but this test is far from the end-all be-all. In fact, there are far more factors at play than just motor size when it comes to determining an e-bike’s uphill ability.
Arguably the largest factor is weight, and how much of it a motor of any size is having to push uphill. Rider weight is probably the largest variable, and obviously heavier e-bikes will likely need more power to climb as quickly as lighter e-bikes.
You also have to consider the type of motor. In this test, we did a head-to-head comparison of two geared rear hub motors of different wattages. If we redid this test to include a mid-drive motor, it’s likely the mid-drive powered bike would require far fewer watts to go as fast or faster than either the Blix or the Tower.
Mid-drive motors make more power out of less wattage by leveraging the bike’s drivetrain, meaning the bike’s performance, torque and speed will change depending on which gear you choose. Whereas a rear hub motor is a direct-drive system that applies power directly to the wheel.
More on Mid-Drive Motors:Is 250W enough power for an electric bike?
Finally torque is a factor that must be considered, especially when talking about uphill performance. More torque typically equates to better climbing, so it’s entirely possible that an extremely torquey 500W motor may beat out a more typically tuned 750W motor — it just depends on the bike and rider.
I could write a whole post dedicated to the factors that dictate climbing performance, so know I’m glossing over them here. But in this case, with these two bikes, on this specific hill and with me as the rider, the more powerful e-bike came out on top.
Ed says
Interesting test, Sam. I was wondering what sized battery each ebike started with and how much fuel was left.
eJimBo says
Well done! The last section about mid-drives and torque are spot-on, IMO, but I gotta comment on this quote from the first section:
“The general consensus (about motor wattage) is that bigger is better.”
For myself and many other aging, long-time cyclists who’ve adopted ebiking to keep riding into our 70s and beyond, less can be much more. This is especially true in terms of getting a more bicycle-like experience. That’s why Specialized developed its SL line, Fazua its Evation, etc.
We may be a quiet minority amongst ebike enthusiasts, but those who think bigger motors are better are far from a general consensus… just sayin’
Camden says
It’s also important to note if this power rating is at the wheel, at the motor, or at the battery. You could have 750w at the battery but the overall drivetrain/motor/controller efficiency and drag losses could be 375 watts, or 50%, so you’d only see 375w at the wheel, which is just torque × rpm, and is the true figure you are comparing here.
geemy says
the 20mph class 2 limit doesn’t limit power under 20mph so it makes no difference with class 3 which is also limited to 750W. although some much more powerful ebikes have class 2 or 3 that will limit power to 750W
Mark Hendricks says
Why do we continue to waste so much time and consideration on these poorly made relics of The 90’s? The fact is, as they slow under a load, approaching a hill, struggling off-road or in to a stiff wind, they loose power…when you need it most!
Today, great mid-drives, from the biggest e-bike component mfg’s, are as affordable as hub drives. With torque sensing, they are more simple, responsive and efficient. The new Bafang motors have Bosch beating features and apps. Tongsheng, Dapu and Ananda have competitive torque and are remarkably quiet. They’ve proven reliable and man are they affordable.