Lectric XP Trike vs. Rad Power Bikes RadTrike
Both Trikes From These E-Bike Heavyweights Have Their Merits. Which One is Best for You?
As two of our picks for the Best Electric Tricycles, the Rad Power Bikes RadTrike and the Lectric XP Trike are two options that consumers are likely to consider.
These models have much in common, and their similarities may make it difficult to sort out which is best for specific individual needs. By comparing the two trikes, we can more easily identify their differences.
Both brands took a unique approach in the areas of propulsion, frame design, brake systems, and user interface. There is certainly overlap between them, but as we will discuss, the two tricycles have individual, well-defined strengths and weaknesses.
With many similar features shared between the two models, which Trike earns our recommendation?
In addition to our standardized test data, there are SIX primary elements we consider when comparing the two trikes, as we detail below.
Lectric XP Trike |
Rad Power Bikes RadTrike |
Lectric XP Trike vs Rad Power Bikes RadTrike: Test Results & Key Specs
Lectric XP Trike | Rad Power Bikes RadTrike | |
Testing Results | ||
Range Test – Maximum PAS | 39.9 miles | 24.7 miles |
Range Test – Minimum PAS | 53.5 miles | 58.9 miles |
Hill Test – Throttle | 1:51, 9.8 mph | 1:54, 9.5 mph |
Hill Test – Pedal | 1:40, 10.8 mph | 1:33, 11.3 mph |
Speed Test | PAS 0 – 7.8 mph PAS 1 – 8.7 mph PAS 2 – 11.2 mph PAS 3 – 13.2 mph PAS 4 – 13.3 mph PAS 5 – 13.4 mph |
PAS 0 – 5.0 mph PAS 1 – 5.4 mph PAS 2 – 5.5 mph PAS 3 – 7.0 mph PAS 4 – 10.6 mph PAS 5 – 14.0 mph |
Brake Test | 13’2” | 10’5” |
Electrical | ||
Motor | 500W nominal, 1092W peak planetary geared brushless motor | 750W brushless Rad Power Bikes geared front hub motor, 5:1 planetary gear reduction. |
Battery | 48V, 14Ah (672 Wh) | 48V, 10Ah (480Wh) |
Charger | 48V, 2 Amp charger | 48V, 2 Amp Rad Power Bikes smart charger |
Pedal Assist | 5-level pedal assist, PWR Programming, Beginner Mode | 5-level pedal assist |
Display | backlit, heads-up LCD display | Battery charge, pedal assist level, and headlight |
Throttle | Half-twist throttle | Half-twist throttle with reverse backup assist |
Key Components | ||
Frame | Fully foldable 6061 aluminum | Chromoly steel |
Brakes | 180mm brake rotors with a hydraulic system for the front wheel and rear axle. Parking brakes help you keep your trike secure while not in use. | Mechanical disk brake, 180mm rotor; foot-operated rear coaster brake; orange parking brake on the brake lever |
Drivetrain | 36 x 16 tooth single-speed drivetrain | 42 x 16 tooth single-speed drivetrain |
Shifters (type) | N/A | N/A |
Fork | Rigid Steel Fork | Rigid steel fork |
Rear Suspension | N/A | N/A |
Tires | Unknown brand, 20 x 2.6-inch tires, reflective strip on the sidewall | Kenda Kontact 18″ x 2.25″, K-Shield puncture-resistant liner |
Handlebar | Low rise w/ telescoping stem | Aluminum alloy high rise, 680 mm wide, 10.3″ rise, 20-degree handlebar sweep |
Grips | Ergonomic rubber, press-fit | Ergonomic rubber grips |
Saddle | Cushioned saddle w/ backrest | Cushioned saddle with adjustable height backrest |
Kickstand | Dual parking brakes | Front parking brake |
Rear Rack | Optional | Optional |
Lights | Integrated front and rear lights with brake lights | LED headlight, Integrated taillight with brake light |
UL Certification | UL 2271, UL 2849 Certified | UL 2271, UL 2849 Compliant |
Weight & Dimensions | ||
Claimed Weight | 69.5 lbs (incl. battery) | 82 lbs (incl. battery) |
Battery Weight | 7 lbs | 8.4 lbs |
Maximum Payload | 415 lbs | 415 lbs |
Maximum Load On Racks (if applicable) | 35 lbs (front), 75 lbs (rear) | 30 lbs (front), 60 lbs (rear) |
Lectric XP Trike |
Rad Power Bikes RadTrike |
Lectric XP Trike vs Rad Power Bikes RadTrike: Range and Battery Capacity
Range Test Results:
Lectric XP Trike | Rad Power Bikes RadTrike | |
Max PAS | 39.9 miles | 24.7 miles |
Min PAS | 53.5 miles | 58.9 miles |
Based on the higher battery capacity of the Lectric XP Trike (672 Wh vs 480 Wh), we anticipated that its range would exceed that of the Rad Power Bikes trike, but our results were not so simple.
Our Range Test evaluated the mileage and motor/battery efficiency of the XP Trike and the RadTrike. We rode each tricycle on our network of local bike paths until their batteries expired. A high-power (PAS 5) test yielded their minimum range, while a second low-power (PAS 1-2) test showed their maximum range potential.
In PAS 5, the XP Trike was able to surpass the RadTrike by a margin of nearly 15 miles; its success was likely due to the speed limitations of its Beginner Mode. As the XP Trike ships, its maximum speed is limited to 12 mph (users can unlock it to 14 mph later), thereby reducing the amount of power drawn from its battery.
The RadTrike’s higher speed (14 mph) and its motor’s higher nominal wattage likely reduced its range. Considering the magnitude of difference, however, we expect the XP Trike would still likely surpass the RadTrike had we tested it in its normal riding mode.
In the low-assist test, the RadTrike kept moving after the XP Trike ran out of steam, though the difference was only a few miles. Considering that the RadTrike is heavier and possesses both a more powerful motor and a smaller battery – and that the 5-6 mph speed of both trikes was similar – the Rad Power model proved to have better overall efficiency.
When speaking with current trike owners, we have found that most users tend to ride for distances of 10-12 miles at a time. As such, we consider both models to have a practical range for a variety of uses, be those leisure, errand-running, or exercise.
Ultimately, both trikes performed similarly when using their low assist settings, but a greater difference appeared when traveling at higher speeds. We expect that the difference would be less extreme with the XP Trike unlocked to its 14 mph maximum, but its results suggest that riding in Beginner Mode has the advantage of extending its mileage.
We expect most riders will operate their trike at higher assist levels. Therefore, the greater difference in results between max PAS tests takes precedence over the smaller difference between low-assist results. With its ability to travel longer distances at higher assist levels, we consider the XP Trike to be the most practical option for those needing the most range.
Lectric XP Trike vs Rad Power Bikes RadTrike: Power (Hill Test)
Hill Test Results:
Lectric XP Trike | Rad Power Bikes RadTrike | |
Throttle | 1:51, 9.8 mph | 1:56, 9.5 mph |
Pedal | 1:40, 10.8 mph | 1:33, 11.3 mph |
The XP Trike and the RadTrike both performed well in our Hill Test, with Lectric’s model proving slightly faster in the throttle test and Rad’s taking the lead in the pedal test. We tested both trikes at our standard location called Hell Hole Trail, where the paved path has a steep average grade of 12% over a third of a mile.
For this test, we unlocked the XP Trike to its full potential outside of the Beginner Mode it ships in; this increased its maximum speed from 12 mph to 14 mph.
This test highlighted two key differences between the trikes’ motors. The RadTrike uses a 750W front-hub motor while the XP Trike is equipped with a 500W hub motor mounted between the rear wheels.
At face value, the RadTrike’s motor appears more powerful, but it does not peak above its stated wattage. The Lectric’s motor reaches up to 1092 watts, giving it an edge in climbing power when relying solely on the throttle.
In the pedal test, the combination of our tester’s effort and the RadTrike’s 85 Newton-meters (Nm) of torque proved more effective than the 65 Nm from the XP Trike’s motor.
Ultimately, the difference of less than 10 seconds between both trikes in this test shows that each is a successful climber. We also tested the cargo-hauling capability of both trikes with their racks carrying their maximum capacity and found both models able to power uphill confidently under load. As such, we consider both to be equal in climbing ability.
Lectric XP Trike |
Rad Power Bikes RadTrike |
Lectric XP Trike vs Rad Power Bikes RadTrike: Brakes (Brake Test)
Lectric XP Trike | Rad Power Bikes RadTrike | |
Ave Stopping Distance | 13’2” | 10’5” |
The RadTrike stopped significantly faster than the XP Trike in our Brake Test, though both tricycles have effective brake systems with good performance. We calculated an average stopping distance for both models after three tests. Each time, our tester Griffin applied the brakes after reaching 13-14 mph, then measured how far the trike traveled.
The RadTrike’s combination of two brake types proved more effective in our testing. Rad Power Bikes equipped their trike with a single mechanical front brake and a rear coaster brake (like the red tricycle many of us had as kids!). For those of us less familiar with coaster brakes, this setup took some getting used to, but it proved functionally superior.
The XP Trike uses a hydraulic brake system similar to those found on most e-bikes, which features 180mm rotors – one on the front wheel and another between the rear wheels. This setup proved to be slower by the numbers, but it felt and functioned well, even when the front and rear baskets were loaded to their maximum capacity.
In addition to its brake system, which is powered by some of the largest and strongest muscles in the human body, we believe the RadTrike’s lower center of gravity helped to reduce its stopping distance. With 18” wheels (as opposed to the XP Trike’s 20” wheels), the RadTrike sits lower, and its weight is more balanced when braking.
With more experience using handlebar-mounted brake levers, I personally preferred the familiar, intuitive nature of the XP Trike’s front and rear hydraulic brakes, but the results don’t lie; the RadTrike was a clear champion in this test. If you grew up using coaster brakes, I expect you’ll find the Rad’s setup easy to adapt to.
Lectric XP Trike vs Rad Power Bikes RadTrike: Speed Capabilities (Speed Test)
Lectric XP Trike | Rad Power Bikes RadTrike | |
PAS 0 | 7.8 mph | 5.0 mph |
PAS 1 | 8.7 mph | 5.4 mph |
PAS 2 | 11.2 mph | 5.5 mph |
PAS 3 | 13.2 mph | 7.0 mph |
PAS 4 | 13.3 mph | 10.6 mph |
PAS 5 | 13.4 mph | 14.0 mph |
To test the speed of both trikes, we recorded our speeds in each of their pedal assist settings while riding on a flat section of paved bike path. We tested the XP Trike in both its beginner mode and its standard riding mode, but for this comparison, we will compare data from the latter test. More information is available in our full Lectric XP Trike Review.
The RadTrike and XP Trike share the same programmed maximum speed of 14 mph, but their results in our Speed Test were extremely different. Where the XP Trike showed greater differences in speed between its low-assist levels, the RadTrike’s higher assist settings differed more.
In the XP Trike’s case, its speeds were a result of Lectric’s PWR (or Pedal Assist Wattage Regulation) Programming; this current-based output regulates the amount of power produced by the motor instead of controlling the trike’s maximum speed. The bike’s higher PAS settings provide more current and faster acceleration.
Our test showed that the XP Trike’s motor was powerful enough to bring it up to maximum speed using the moderate level of current in PAS 3; the added power of PAS 4 or 5 was not necessary. Had the test taken place on a hill, the higher power levels would likely have shown a difference in maximum speeds.
The RadTrike, on the other hand, uses a standard speed-based cadence sensor. At low power levels, the motor supplemented my pedaling, but the experience felt organic, as though I was riding an analog trike. At higher assist levels, the motor took over and did more of the work, so the pre-programmed limits were subsequently more apparent.
Ultimately, both trikes seemed to take a different route to a similar destination. While the RadTrike had only a single riding mode, its low/mid assist levels behaved similarly to the XP Trike’s Beginner Mode.
Additionally, both trikes had a few practical pedal assist settings (once riders are comfortable moving faster than five mph) with 1-2 higher power modes for hills and carrying cargo.
The XP Trike includes another feature we greatly appreciated: the ability to control throttle speed through the pedal assist system (PAS). The motor’s output is limited to the same ceilings, whether using throttle or pedal assist. This allows users to control and adjust their speed more easily when relying on the throttle.
Bottom line: both trikes had a safe range of speeds appropriate for beginners and more experienced users. Each had its own unique feel, but we consider both to be effective and user-friendly.
Lectric XP Trike |
Rad Power Bikes RadTrike |
Lectric XP Trike vs Rad Power Bikes RadTrike: Components
In our brake test section above, we discussed the XP Trike’s hydraulic disc brake system and the RadTrike’s mechanical disc/coaster system; we preferred the XP Trike’s familiar feel and the included dual parking brakes, but riders used to coaster brakes may prefer the Rad.
As indicated by the results of our Range Test section above, the XP’s smaller 500W motor and larger 672 Wh battery showed better performance when moving at higher speeds than the Rad’s larger 750W motor and smaller 480 Wh battery.
We also preferred the slightly more natural feel of the XP Trike’s 500W motor; its placement between the rear wheels felt similar to a mid-drive, as opposed to the pulled-from-the-front feel of the RadTrike’s 750W front hub. This preference was minimal, however, as the trike’s power levels felt similar enough despite their differences in nominal wattage.
Similarly, the XP Trike’s motor resulted in better traction. While it did not affect the ride most of the time, the Rad’s front-hub motor could cause its front wheel to spin out. The Lectric’s central motor placement kept its weight balanced, and with a differential axle allowing both rear wheels to get power, the XP Trike had slightly better grip.
The RadTrike scored a win over the XP when looking at its drivetrain. While both trikes have single-speed drivetrains, the Rad uses a 42T chainring that does not ghost pedal as quickly as the smaller 36T chainring of the Lectric. This kept our pedaling active and engaged at higher speeds.
There were tradeoffs between the tire size of each model. On the one hand, the RadTrike’s smaller 18×2.25” tires helped the tricycle sit lower and feel more stable and balanced, but the impact of bumps was more pronounced. The XP Trike’s 20×2.6” tires felt more comfortable on bumps but raised its center of gravity and slightly reduced its stability.
The XP Trike’s knobby tires also grant it greater flexibility in where it can be ridden. While the RadTrike’s smooth street tires are well-suited to the vehicle’s role, the Lectric’s textured tread pattern allows it to ride on smooth, easy, multi-use trails in addition to paved surfaces.
We liked the RadTrike’s overall cockpit layout and feel – and the inclusion of a reverse throttle option – though it lost some points in our eyes due to the absence of a standard display with a speedometer. The XP’s display was basic but functional, and we appreciated the modulated control over throttle speed through the trike’s pedal assist system.
Another of the XP’s features we found appealing was its ability to quickly fold and become more compact for storage or transport. The RadTrike’s frame can split in half, but doing so requires tools and additional time, whereas Lectric’s folding frame can be broken down in seconds.
The XP Trike also has a slight edge in terms of carrying capacity. The two models share the same total payload capacity of 415 lbs, but the XP Trike can carry 15 pounds of additional cargo on its optional rear rack and five additional pounds on its optional front rack when compared to the Rad.
Overall, while we found much to appreciate about the RadTrike—and found some of its features (like the reverse throttle) more ideal—we feel that the XP Trike comes slightly better equipped.
Lectric XP Trike vs Rad Power Bikes RadTrike: Ride Quality
Rad designed its tricycle to be slightly more relaxed, roomy, and comfortable than the XP; we found Lectric’s model to be slightly more cramped. With a slackened seat tube angle, the RadTrike’s pedals are placed more forward, which gives the riding position an ergonomic feel that we prefer over the XP Trike’s steeper positioning.
The standover height of both options is similar, with the XP Trike at 13.8 inches and the RadTrike at a slightly lower 13.4 inches. The difference was slightly noticeable, though we would have preferred the RadTrike’s battery to be mounted in a different location.
The RadTrike also had better overall handling. Its chromoly steel frame felt solid and stiff. With a lower center of gravity and a wider distance between its rear wheels, it felt more stable when turning. The Rad’s combination of high-rise handlebars and standard, non-collapsible threadless stem also made corning more crisp.
As mentioned previously, the XP Trike was ultimately more portable thanks to its lighter aluminum folding frame and collapsible stem. It could still be cumbersome – hence our recommendation to have help when lifting – but we preferred the easy folding of Lectric’s trike over the multiple disassembly steps of the RadTrike.
We found both to be similarly easy to use in terms of overall operation. The single-speed drivetrain on each trike required no additional shifting. We liked the included display and throttle speed control of the XP Trike but found the reverse throttle of the RadTrike to be an even trade.
Both can also be outfitted with a wide variety of optional accessories to increase their utility or personalize their feel. At the time of writing, Rad’s website lists 37 accessories that are compatible with the RadTrike, and Lectric’s website offers a whopping 55 options. These include cargo racks, baskets, and bags, alternate saddles and grips, and even pet trailers.
In the end, the XP Trike had some advantages with its motor placement, open differential axle, brake lights, and wider tires. Still, we preferred the RadTrike’s ride quality due to its geometry and riding position, its comfort level, and its wide range of compatible accessories.
Lectric XP Trike vs Rad Power Bikes RadTrike: Which Should You Choose?
The XP Trike and the RadTrike share many features and offer similar performance. As such, we consider both to be excellent options for an affordable electric tricycle.
To determine which of the two models is best overall, however, we must consider both our test data and hands-on experience. As such, we have identified six main categories for comparison.
As a caveat, it is important to remember that in most cases, only small differences separate the two trikes; when considering the categories below, the declaration of a winner does not mean the other is sub-par.
Specs: The XP Trike won our comparison in this category by a small margin. The RadTrike is equipped with a better brake system and a reverse throttle that we liked, but we preferred the XP Trike’s full-size display, its slightly greater cargo capacity, and its more portable, quickly-folding frame.
Motor: Again, the XP Trike earned a win when we compared the trikes’ drive systems. The two models have a similar feel and comparable power levels, but the XP Trike’s centrally-mounted motor provided better traction. Its PWR programming resulted in a more natural feel. Finally, with easily controlled throttle speeds, it was more user-friendly.
Hill Climbing Ability: We consider the trikes to be tied in uphill power. While their motors appear different on paper (and also differ by feel), they are similarly capable of throttling or pedaling over steep hills with or without cargo.
Range: The XP Trike performed better in this category thanks to its larger battery capacity and power-saving Beginner Mode. There was little difference between the trikes’ low-power modes, but when riding at higher speeds, Lectric’s model offered more mileage. We expect most riders will use higher levels of pedal assist (or the throttle) and prefer the XP’s ability.
Ride Quality: We awarded the RadTrike a win in this category. The trikes differed minimally in features, feel, and handling, but we found the RadTrike’s greater stability, comfort, and more relaxed riding position to be preferable.
Value for the Money: While the difference in price between the trikes is relatively small ($200 at the time of writing), the XP Trike proved to be the better value. We appreciated the RadTrike’s reverse throttle, its riding position, and its overall comfort, but the differences were small enough that we’d opt for the lower-priced Lectric XP Trike.
With wins in the Specs, Motor, Hill Climbing, Range, and Value categories, the XP Trike proved to be the best overall option. Data aside, we appreciated its motor placement, throttle control, PAS programming, and folding frame. We feel that it is likely best for those seeking a trike with portability, long-range capability, and/or the most bang for the buck.
The RadTrike, however, might be better suited to different types of riders due to its strengths. These include its reverse throttle, its lower and more stable frame, and its more relaxed riding position. It would likely be best for those who do not need portability or those who prioritize comfort, accessibility, or backward maneuverability.
Bottom line: both options are extremely functional, value-packed, and easy to use. The XP Trike earned our recognition as the better overall option between the two, but that should not detract from the RadTrike’s force as a capable and comfortable electric trike.
Lectric XP Trike |
Rad Power Bikes RadTrike |
James says
But, Rad Trike is not available in Canada, RadPower said.James