Lectric XP Trike2 Review | Limited Mobility Can’t Limit You

Lectric advertises a range of up to 50 miles with the XP Trike2’s combination of a 500W motor and a 624-watt-hour (Wh) battery. Using the method described in the graphic above, we determined that the brand’s advertisements are accurate; our test riders traveled 30.6 miles using the trike’s highest level of pedal assist and 52.3 miles with its lowest.

Similar electric tricycles we tested averaged 30.6 and 48.5 miles, so the XP Trike2 was roughly average in comparison. We always applaud average performance (especially on affordable/entry-level models), as those numbers indicate that the model we’re testing is well-specced and able to keep pace with its peers.

It is worth noting that the Trike2’s 624 Wh battery is somewhat smaller than the original XP Trike’s 672 Wh power supply. This is an area where Lectric likely made a compromise to balance the new model’s upgrades and low price, which we consider to be more than a fair trade in the current market, though it is admittedly somewhat of a downgrade.

The difference in capacity was noticeable in our high-power range test; the original model traveled nearly 40 miles while the XP Trike2 only slightly exceeded the 30-mile mark. In our low-assist test, however, the Trike2 proved equally efficient. Its result of 52.3 miles differed little from the original XP Trike’s 53.5-mile result.

In the big picture, the XP Trike2’s motor proved more efficient than expected. Based on its battery capacity and motor specs, we estimated that its Turbo mode test would last roughly an hour and 15 minutes, yielding only around 17 miles of range. Its 30+ mile result, which was measured over the course of 2 hours and 15 minutes, shows a 76% increase beyond our expectations in time and a 76% increase in distance.

Considering that a majority of the e-trike riders we’ve interacted with usually travel distances well within the XP Trike2’s range of results, it’s likely that most users should get multiple trips from a single charge. Our Speed Test results reinforce this; the trike’s ability to reach its top speed using mid-power assist levels shows that at least some riders should be able to use one of the trike’s more efficient settings to conserve power.

One minor point of critique is the XP Trike2’s method of displaying its battery charge level. While I generally like the display (more on that later), its percentage-based readout drops in increments of 10%, making it effectively bar-based and somewhat inaccurate. After spending some time in the saddle and learning its patterns, however, I was better able to predict the trike’s remaining charge and range.

Once the battery is fully drained and recharging is necessary, the standard 2-amp charger should complete the process in roughly 6.5 hours. Those who want to reduce the trike’s charging time can upgrade to a 5-amp fast charger with the ability to recharge the power source in less than 3 hours.

Again, based on its performance in this test, we consider the XP Trike2 to be successful and well-specced!

Hill-climbing power is another essential metric to evaluate and be aware of; we tested the XP Trike2’s capabilities using the method described above. Our test rider, Justin, completed both the throttle and pedal portions of the test in what we consider respectable times, though comparison with similar models is difficult.

We recently moved (read: were forced to relocate) our Hill Test to the Devil’s Backbone, and as such, we are in the process of building a new dataset. At the time of writing, the XP Trike2 is the only electric tricycle we have tested at the new location.

To gather more data, I tested the XP Trike2 both with and without 60 lbs of cargo on its rack at our secondary test location, called Pilot Hill. This hill is less intimidating than the Devil’s Backbone, with just under 100 feet of elevation gain and an average grade of around 6%, though it still presents a tough climb that most cyclists choose to walk up.

There, the XP Trike2 completed an unladen trip up the hill in 1:29 using its throttle and 1:30 when pedaling. With weight added to the optional rear cargo basket, my times lengthened to 1:47 when throttling (a difference of 18 seconds, or 20.2%) and 1:40 in Turbo mode (a 10-second difference, or 11.1%).

An extremely similar model we tested recently scored 1:32 and 1:29 at the same location when riding without cargo. Its times were 1:45 and 1:33, with the same amount of weight in its cargo basket. Overall, both trikes shared similar performance and test completion times. As with the Range Test section above, this indicates that the XP Trike2 is capable and well-specced.

Ultimately, we tend to evaluate electric trikes on their ability to complete our formal Hill Test, rather than their speed when doing so. In my experience, the XP Trike2 felt powerful enough to handle hills and heavy loads without being hindered. Its performance scores and the fact that it completed our tests at both locations serve to reinforce its effective climbing ability.

In our book, that means a job well done.

We tested the XP Trike2’s braking performance using the method described above; its average stopping distance was an impressive 12’6”.

I was surprised to note that the current average for all comparable e-trikes we’ve tested was an average of 12’3”; this goes to show that most have impressive stopping power and that the XP Trike 2 is relatively average in comparison.

It’s worth noting that the trikes we’ve tested have had a variety of different speed limits and brake types. A handful have had similar 14 mph speed limits and similar hydraulic disc brake systems, but others have been faster, used coaster or mechanical brakes, or came equipped with three calipers and rotors instead of two.

As such, an apples-to-apples comparison is not possible, but we can consider that the XP Trike2 showed noticeably better performance than the original XP Trike, which scored 13’2” in this test.

The upgrade was noticeable in both appearance and feel. The Trike2’s Star Union hydraulic brake system features thicker rotors (2.3mm vs. 1.8mm), which are better able to dissipate heat. Additionally, it has more robust brake levers, brake lever bodies, and parking brakes compared to the previous model.

There were times that I applied the brakes and thought to myself that I would likely not want them to be any more powerful; braking could be fast and slightly aggressive, which was also confidence-inspiring. I paid particular attention to their performance when riding down Pilot Hill (described above) with 60 lbs of cargo; the brakes easily controlled my speed and stopped the trike safely before arriving at a busy intersection.

All in all, the brakes proved mighty, safe, and quite effective; the XP Trike2 has earned our approval based on its feel and performance.

Ride quality is a measure of how a bike feels to ride, and is naturally more subjective than our performance tests above. The subject of ride quality factors in a variety of elements, including geometry and sizing, suspension, handling, motor engagement, the user interface, etc.

Overall, the XP Trike2’s ride quality was excellent. The new model’s redesigned frame and upgraded components all worked well to make the experience of using it comfortable and enjoyable, though we did identify a few areas with room for improvement.

Lectric makes the XP Trike2 in a single frame size that is intended for riders between 4’10” and 6’2”. We feel this height range is somewhat more appropriate than the original model’s top end of 6’4”, as the first XP Trike could feel somewhat limiting for taller riders.

Accommodating such a broad range of riders is no easy task, but the XP Trike2 offers multiple adjustment points to dial in its fit. A long seatpost provides 12” of adjustment in its saddle height, the telescoping stem offers 3-plus inches of handlebar height adjustment, and with a set of BMX-style handlebars, riders can rotate the handlebars to adjust reach.

At 5’11”, I found a very comfortable fit and riding position. I didn’t find that I needed full leg extension due to the trike’s propensity for ghost pedaling (as discussed above, this is a natural side effect of single-speed drivetrains), and the reach felt comfortable without being cramped or too stretched out.

Like the original mode, the Trike2’s geometry gave the sense of pedaling somewhat below and behind the usual position of a bicycle, though I found that the sensation was lessened by keeping the pedals more in the middle of my foot than the ball of my foot.

In terms of contact points, I found the thick saddle with its adjustable backrest to be comfortable and supportive. I also liked the ergonomic rubber grips and Lectric’s custom aluminum pedals.

As I touched on previously, some of the Trike2’s upgrades are a custom suspension fork offering 50mm of travel and a suspension seatpost with 40mm of travel (an accessory that previously needed to be added separately). The combination of suspension components made for a generally smooth and enjoyable ride; I could still feel large bumps, but their impact was significantly reduced.

The tires are a set of relatively smooth 20×2.5” street tires that provide great traction on paved surfaces. This is partly a result of the Trike2’s mid-mounted hub motor and differential axle, a design that Lectric popularized with the previous XP Trike, as it delivers power to both rear wheels, which are also largely beneath the weight of the rider.

Personally, I liked that the previous model came with knobbier tires that allowed for light off-roading on smooth dirt or gravel roads; the XP Trike2 would likely be more comfortable in such conditions due to its suspension, but its street tires naturally won’t have as much grip. Fortunately, tires are an easy and relatively affordable thing to upgrade!

Let’s take a moment to discuss the XP Trike2’s folding ability. Like the previous model, its frame is hinged, allowing the front end to swing around and tuck between the frame and the left rear wheel. This feature, which is relatively common on e-trikes, has the potential to enable the XP Trike2 to become more compact for storage or transportation.

As a downside, it’s worth noting that at 91 lbs (including an 8.5 lb battery), the XP Trike2 can be both heavy and cumbersome. We recommend at least two sets of youthful and capable hands when moving it or loading it into a vehicle. Additionally, to fully fold the trike, its front wheel and fenders must be removed, making the process somewhat lengthy and involved.

On the plus side, I noticed that the Trike2 felt noticeably more sturdy and stable while riding than the previous (and noticeably lighter) model. Delta-style tricycles (one wheel at the front and two in the rear) can be notoriously easy to tip up on two wheels when cornering, but the XP’s weight kept it well planted during my testing.

I was pleased to note that the XP Trike2 included turn signals and a total of three brake lights for visibility. It was also great to see a chain guard included, though I’d prefer a thin-gauge aluminum to the relatively thin plastic for the sake of durability.

In terms of the user interface, I was very much a fan of Lectric’s new color display, which included color-coded PAS settings, a power meter, and all the usual ride data presented in a clean and easy-to-read manner. I also liked its settings menu, which offers a handful of customization options for the riding mode and throttle behavior.

Having tested a number of e-trikes, including the best electric trikes on the market, I can say that I have rarely been as impressed by any model as I was with the XP Trike2. It simply felt safe, sturdy, comfortable, and well put together. I also found it easy to operate and capable as both a utility device and a method of experiencing enjoyment or exercise.

I’m left with a similar sense that I had after recently reviewing the Lectric XP4 folding e-bike. It’s truly hard to wrap my head around the XP Trike2’s excellent ride experience while at the same time considering its remarkably affordable price; it’s further evidence of how far Lectric has evolved as a brand.

Of course, the Trike2 is not a perfect machine, but its few downsides are reasonable trade-offs for its low price and overall value. Most riders likely won’t mind the slightly shorter range in high power levels that comes as a result of its smaller battery (when compared with the previous model).

Additionally, the trike’s weight and relatively complex folding process may make it relatively tough to move or lift when stationary. However, while I could be wrong, I would hazard a guess that those making use of the folding frame might be in the minority.

Otherwise, the XP Trike2 performed extremely well, with average to above-average performance in all areas of our testing. It offers a wide range of speed and power levels, making it practical and approachable for both new and experienced riders. It demonstrated respectable, usable range and climbing power. Finally, its brakes felt powerful and well-balanced in relation to the trike’s speeds and weight capacity.

I appreciated all of the trike’s upgrades, especially ride-quality-enhancing items like the display, rubberized control pad, turn signals, and suspension. I must also give Lectric kudos for the Trike2’s appearance; it’s a sleeker, more appealing design than the original model, and it’s also offered in more color options.

My experience makes it easy to recommend the XP Trike2 for those seeking a safe, high-quality, budget-friendly, and fun-to-use electric tricycle. Whether you’re disabled, aging, or simply prefer the added stability of three wheels to two, Lectric’s trike is well-suited for cruising, running errands, and otherwise getting out and about.

One final note: the brand is slated to release an upgraded model of the XP Trike2 in the near future. This e-trike will have a more powerful 750W motor, a torque sensor, a larger battery, and a much wider variety of colors. We look forward to receiving, testing, and reviewing this model; stay tuned for updates!

Otherwise, the XP Trike2 performed extremely well, with average to above-average performance in all areas of our testing. It offers a wide range of speed and power levels, making it practical and approachable for both new and experienced riders. It demonstrated respectable, usable range and climbing power. Finally, its brakes felt powerful and well-balanced in relation to the trike’s speeds and weight capacity.

I appreciated all of the trike’s upgrades, especially ride-quality-enhancing items like the display, rubberized control pad, turn signals, and suspension. I must also give Lectric kudos for the Trike2’s appearance; it’s a sleeker, more appealing design than the original model, and it’s also offered in more color options.

My experience makes it easy to recommend the XP Trike2 for those seeking a safe, high-quality, budget-friendly, and fun-to-use electric tricycle. Whether you’re disabled, aging, or simply prefer the added stability of three wheels to two, Lectric’s trike is well-suited for cruising, running errands, and otherwise getting out and about.

One final note: the brand is slated to release an upgraded model of the XP Trike2 in the near future. This e-trike will have a more powerful 750W motor, a torque sensor, a larger battery, and a much wider variety of colors. We look forward to receiving, testing, and reviewing this model; stay tuned for updates!

Happy Riding! Make sure to let us know if you have any questions or if you think we left anything out in this review of the Lectric XP Trike2 down in our comments section.